April 29, 2024
Nasim Ghanbari

Nasim Ghanbari

Academic Rank: Assistant professor
Address:
Degree: Ph.D in English Language Teaching
Phone: 077 3122 2321
Faculty: Faculty of Humanities

Research

Title
Working Memory in Independent Writing vs. Integrated Writing: The Effect of Prior Knowledge
Type Thesis
Keywords
working memory, independent writing, integrated writing, phonological loop, visuospatial sketchpad, central executive
Researchers marziye razmi (Student) , Nasim Ghanbari (Primary advisor) , Fatemeh Nemati (Advisor)

Abstract

As a cognitive activity, writing skill can be divided into independent and integrated types. The term independent writing refers to writing that is based on the writer's own experiences and knowledge. Integrated writing refers to writing that is built upon pre-source information, whether it is listening, reading, or a combination of both. Essentially, it helps writers start their writing with prior knowledge. As a mental and cognitive element, working memory is heavily involved in these writing activities. It consists of four components: phonological loop, visuospatial sketchpad, central executive (Baddeley and Hitch, 1974), and episodic buffer (Baddeley, 2000). In the current study, we aimed to examine how these components were involved into the independent vs. the integrated writing tasks. To conduct the study, ten participants took part. Think aloud protocols and interviews provided the data. As a result of statistical and non-statistical the data analyses, all WM components were cooperatively involved in both writing tasks. While the demands on the WM components were not significantly different between the independent and the integrated writing tasks, the amount of demand on each component varied through the writing stages in two tasks. In the other words, for example, the most burden was placed on the visuospatial and the central executive components because of generating ideas and making reasons during the planning phase of the independent task. As part of the integrated task, in the planning stage, the phonological loop demands were heavy because of reading comprehension, and the visuospatial sketchpad demands were due to finding information from the pre-source text. Since writers had prior knowledge, it was easy for them to explain their reasoning. As a final note, in order to accurately evaluate the writing abilities of writers, writing evaluators can use both types of writing tasks with virtually similar memory loads.