Hossein Mohtadi

Rhetoric scholars have mentioned various methods of Hasr The most common is the use of negation and exception. It is mostly done using the tool " الّا " (ella), But sometimes tools other than “ الّا” (ella) are used in the exception. Which contains the meaning of "الّا " (ella), One of these tools is the stressed word “لمّا” (lamma). Which when it comes after the oath with the negation, It contains the meaning of "الّا " (ella) and replaces it. There are four verses in the Holy Qur’an in which the words “إن” and “لمّا” (lamma) appear. There is evidence that in these verses we can consider “إن” (en) to be a negation and “لمّا” (lamma) to mean “ الّا” (ella) This way it can be put into Hasr style. This research used the descriptive-analytical method to study the aspects of reading and parsing these verses. He explained the conditions for Hasring these verses in the style of Hasring, and the type and methods of Hasring and purpose of Hasring in these verses The results of the research show that God took into account the requirements of the addressees’ situation by using the negation tool “إن,” (en) which is the most emphatic. By bringing “كل” (all) after the negation, he expanded the comprehensiveness of that ruling and its totality to include all those addressed. The use of “لمّا” (lamma) instead of “ الّا” (ella) did not separate or exclude any person or thing from the scope of that provision. Since limiting what is limited to what is limited has occurred in matters that are likely to be denied or doubted by the public, therefore “لمّا” (lamma) was used to be accompanied by hope and expectation, and the public hopes and expects, What is Hasred to it includes everything within the scope of what is Hasred and containing every attribute on the part of what is described.