15 آذر 1404

محمدباقر نگهبان

مرتبه علمی: دانشیار
نشانی: دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی - گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی
تحصیلات: دکترای تخصصی / علم اطلاعات
تلفن: 07731222044
دانشکده: دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی

مشخصات پژوهش

عنوان Applied Training in Conducting Scientometric Professional Studies and Mapping and Analyzing Medical Scientific Networks
نوع پژوهش مقالات در نشریات
کلیدواژه‌ها
Keywords: Scientometrics, Scientific Network Analysis, VOSviewer
مجله Spanish journal of medical education
شناسه DOI DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.684541
پژوهشگران محمدباقر نگهبان (نفر اول)

چکیده

The document is a structured, applied training guide designed to bridge the educational gap in conducting professional scientometric studies, with a specific focus on the mapping and analysis of medical scientific networks. Scientometrics is presented as a key approach for systematically assessing knowledge structure, trends, and collaboration, which is indispensable in the rapidly evolving fields of medicine. The guide proposes a practical eight-step framework for the researcher, beginning with a clear definition of a research objective and thematic scope. Crucial steps include selecting authoritative data sources such as Web of Science or Scopus and formulating a precise search strategy using Boolean operators. Following data collection and refinement, the process focuses on network visualization and analysis. For analysis, it is recommended to export complete records to specialized tools such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Gephi. These software programs are used to generate maps of co-authorship, co-citation, and co-word networks, which reveal the social, intellectual, and conceptual structure of a field. The document emphasizes that the interpretation is vital. This phase transforms visualizations and metrics into meaningful insights, which connect with research objectives and allow for the detection of emerging trends or knowledge gaps. Furthermore, the guide introduces advanced bias and integrity detection, using AI to identify anomalies such as citation circles or redundant patterns. Finally, the author underscores the need for clear, transparent, and reproducible reporting, ensuring that the findings serve as a strategic and reliable tool for decision-making and scientific policy