یوسف کاظم زاده

In gas injection, which is one of the fascinating enhanced oil recovery techniques, the main mechanism involves decreasing interfacial tension (IFT). Although various mechanisms can affect the IFT of a system, in most experimental and numerical studies, condensation is considered the dominant mechanism among condensation-vaporization and vaporization. Investigating the impact of each mechanism is crucial as they can influence the IFT of the system and, consequently, the effectiveness of the gas injection method. This study introduces a novel model to assess the influence of different mechanisms on system IFT. The model defines system IFT, adjusts fluid relative permeability to represent miscible, immiscible, and near-miscible states, and utilizes the Buckley–Leverett method to analyze gas fractional flow and saturation profiles when injecting carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrogen (N2). Furthermore, the research explores the impact of injection pressure and IFT at minimum miscible pressure (IFT0) on gas injection efficiency. Based on our results, for both live and dead oil, the condensation mechanism reduces IFT and near-miscible pressure; switching to a condensing-vaporizing mechanism increases these parameters. This trend was consistent across all gases studied (N2, CO2, CH4), with a more significant effect observed on the CH4-live oil system compared to N2 and CO2. Controlling the condensing mechanism in IFT measurements enhances gas flow rate and relative permeability curve within the medium. Higher injection pressure in the condensing mechanism and IFT0 = 0.5 leads to faster fluid movement and improved relative permeability due to increased driving forces. Higher IFT0 accelerates the relative permeability of fluids and gas movement within the medium by promoting miscibility sooner. The impact of IFT0 was more pronounced on the dead oil–gas system compared to the live oil–gas system in this study.