In the era of big data, classification problems involving sparse data with high dimensionality have become a fundamental challenge in statistical analysis. Classical methods such as standard logistic regression fail to perform adequately in such settings due to numerical instability, high variance, and overfitting. This thesis investigates and compares three important penalized logistic regression methods (namely Ridge, Lasso, and Elastic Net) in dealing with sparse data, and evaluates their capability to control model complexity, select relevant variables, and improve predictive performance. The performance of these methods is first examined through simulation studies under various scenarios with different sample-to-feature ratios, and then implemented on two real-world datasets: a spam email collection with a limited number of features, and a high-dimensional genomic dataset with an imbalanced class distribution. The findings indicate that in simulated sparse data with numerous noisy features, sparsity-inducing methods such as Lasso and Elastic Net perform better by effectively eliminating irrelevant variables; however, in real-world data with more complex underlying structures, the Ridge model provides more accurate predictions by leveraging all features and reducing variance. Overall, the choice of an appropriate penalization method depends strongly on the nature of the data and the analysis objective—whether predictive accuracy or interpretability through variable selection.