Keywords
|
life cycle assessment (LCA), hybrid desalination, multi-stage flash (MSF), reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF)
|
Abstract
|
Although emerging desalination technologies such as hybrid technologies are required
to tackle water scarcity, the impacts of their application on the environment, resources, and human
health, as prominent pillars of sustainability, should be evaluated in parallel. In the present study,
the environmental footprint of five desalination plants, including multi-stage flash (MSF), hybrid
reverse osmosis (RO)–MSF, hybrid nanofiltration (NF)–MSF, RO, and hybrid NF–RO, in the Persian
Gulf region, have been analyzed using life cycle assessment (LCA) as an effective tool for policy
making and opting sustainable technologies. The comparison was based on the impacts on climate
change, ozone depletion, fossil depletion, human toxicity, and marine eutrophication. The LCA
results revealed the superiority of the hybrid NF–RO plant in having the lowest environmental
impact, although the RO process produces more desalinated water at the same feed and input flow
rates. The hybrid NF–RO system achieves 1.74 kg CO2 equivalent, 1.24 107 kg CFC-11 equivalent,
1.28 104 kg nitrogenous compounds, 0.16 kg 1,4-DB equivalent, and 0.56 kg oil equivalent in the
mentioned impact indicators, which are 7.9 to 22.2% lower than the single-pass RO case. Furthermore,
the sensitivity analysis showed the reliability of the results, which helps to provide an insight into the
life cycle impacts of the desalination plants.
|