10 اردیبهشت 1403
احسان ايزدپناه

احسان ایزدپناه

مرتبه علمی: دانشیار
نشانی: دانشکده مهندسی - گروه مهندسی مکانیک
تحصیلات: دکترای تخصصی / مهندسی مکانیک
تلفن: 09133570349
دانشکده: دانشکده مهندسی

مشخصات پژوهش

عنوان Experimental evaluation of shell geometry impact on thermal and exergy performance in helical coiled tube heat exchanger with phase change material
نوع پژوهش مقالات در نشریات
کلیدواژه‌ها
Thermal energy storage unit Helical coiled tube heat exchanger Phase change material Shell geometry Melting and solidification Exergy
مجله Journal of Energy Storage
شناسه DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.110790
پژوهشگران فرشید نرگس مقدم (نفر اول) ، احسان ایزدپناه (نفر دوم) ، یونس شکاری (نفر سوم) ، یاسر امینی (نفر چهارم)

چکیده

In this paper, the melting (charging) and solidification (discharging) processes of a Phase Change Material (PCM) in a helical coiled tube heat exchanger as a thermal energy storage unit are investigated experimentally. During the charging (discharging) process, hot (cold) water flows through the coil. Paraffin wax is used as a PCM in the shell. The thermal and exergy performances for three different geometries of the shell (cubic, spherical, and trapezoidal) and different flow rates (0.6, 3, and 6 L/min) are investigated. Additionally, numerical simulation is conducted for the spherical thermal energy storage. The obtained results indicate that, at a volumetric flow rate of 6 L/min, the trapezoidal shell reduces the total melting time by 23.38 % and 10.1 % compared to the cubic and spherical shells, respectively. In the solidification process, the spherical shell exhibits the highest efficiency, reducing the total solidification time by 13.79 % and 21.21 % compared to cubic and trapezoidal shells, respectively. Moreover, in a total cycle (both melting and solidification processes) of the thermal energy storage, the spherical shell outperforms, reducing the complete cycle time by 13.4 % and 1.19 % compared to the cubic and trapezoidal shells, respectively. In the all investigated shells, energy, and exergy efficiencies increase with the higher flow rates, with the most significant improvement observed when increasing the flow rate from 0.6 to 3 L/min.