July 2, 2026
Ebrahim Rajabpour

Ebrahim Rajabpour

Academic Rank: Associate professor
Address: Bushehr Province, Bushehr City, Persian Gulf University, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Business Administration
Degree: Ph.D in Public Administration- Human resource management
Phone: 09128497144
Faculty: School of Business and Economics

Research

Title
Designing a antifragile Leadership Model with a Grounded Theory Approach (Case Study: Oil and Gas and Petrochemical Industry)
Type Thesis
Keywords
پادشكنندگي، رهبري پادشكننده، داده بنياد، پايداري، صنعت نفت، گاز و پتروشيمي
Researchers fatemeh zare (Student) , Ebrahim Rajabpour (First primary advisor) , Zaeimeh Nematolahi (Advisor)

Abstract

Background: The oil, gas, and petrochemical industry in Iran operates under chronic instability, including international sanctions, currency fluctuations, political interventions, and environmental shocks. Traditional leadership models often fail under such extreme uncertainty. This study aimed to design a disruptive leadership model grounded in the specific context of this industry, exploring how leaders not only withstand crises but grow stronger from them. Aim: The main objective of this study is to design an antifragile leadership model in the oil, gas, and petrochemical industry using a grounded theory approach. The research aims to identify the key causal, contextual, and environmental conditions shaping antifragile leadership, determine its core phenomenon, explore leaders’ strategic responses to challenges, and examine the outcomes of its implementation within the industry. Methodology: A qualitative grounded theory approach (Strauss & Corbin) was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 18 senior and middle managers from Iran's oil, gas, and petrochemical sector. Purposive and snowball sampling continued until theoretical saturation. Open, axial, and selective coding led to the emergence of categories and a paradigmatic model. Conclusions: The core phenomenon identified was resilient disruptive leadership. Six causal conditions (e.g., perception of chronic instability, transformative learning from failure, cognitive-emotional competencies, transpersonal commitment) triggered this leadership. Five contextual conditions (e.g., dual bureaucratic-agile structure, dual learning-punitive culture) and four intervening conditions (sanctions, macroeconomic volatility, political-legal interference, environmental shocks) shaped its development. Five strategies (smart diversification, decentralized decision-making with strategic focus, multi-scenario management, informal networking and multi-skilled teaming, systematic learning and culturiz